<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arguing gun rights&#8230;a primer for antis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/</link>
	<description>Converting money into smoke and noise, one day at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine responds &#124; Newbie Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine responds &#124; Newbie Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newbieshooter.com/?p=387#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] Catherine has responded to my post &#8220;Arguing gun rights&#8230;a primer for antis&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Catherine has responded to my post &#8220;Arguing gun rights&#8230;a primer for antis&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newbieshooter.com/?p=387#comment-395</guid>
		<description>You are wrong on many accounts:

1.  I was not spouting.  I have an opinion and I am entitled to it.
2.  I have suggested that the approach be far different. If you want a discourse on the topic and really want to educate as you say you do, I think it would be better to do it in a manner that actually indicates that you would like a discourse rather than lecturing and indicating that you think someone who wants gun control is just dumb.  That goes nowhere.
3.   Statistics can be skewed either way.
4.  I was not arguing.  It was my opinion.  The pr-gum bloggers went on my blog and argued.  I only questioned and refuted some of the arguments that did not seem well supported.  Others were never backed up with anything.
5.  There is no &quot;appeal to emotion.&quot;  It was my opinion and how I feel about the topic.  My blog is a forum for expressing my opinions.
6.  You are definitely wrong on this one.  If you look at the sequence, I never called Rustmeister a name.  One day after our conversation was over i received a pingback from his blog.  On his blog he said in essence that I was stupid, crazy and delusional.  So who called who a name?
After that, I wrote a post calling it the way that i see it.  He&#039;s an NRA shill as I see it based on the badges on his blogs.  I also personally think he&#039;s a right wingnut since I do not believe that the Second Amendment stands for the proposition that you need guns to overthrow the government, as gun bloggers were saying on my blog.
7.  I received threatening emails and some very not nice comments from people.  I decided to shut down comments and delete because I felt that it was harassment.  That&#039;s my choice.  When I am getting threatened, I choose to shut down and not post anymore comments form anyone and to delete comments.  I reserve that right.  It was also based on advice from the authorities.

The bottom line is that i may not agree with your arguments, mostly because they are obviously canned, but you can score a lot of points with people by first asking them why they favor gun control and then not making fun of them because they place human life over an assault weapon.  I never want all guns banned.  My father and brother own / have owned guns. I would never want them taken away from them or anyone else, but I do not see the point of having assault weapons.  It is my opinion.  Your opinion on guns is your opinion.

I received a LOT of reaction form the gun bloggers who wrote posts like this (only worse).  You guys did more than I ever could have (assuming that was my intent and it was not) to further the gun control cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are wrong on many accounts:</p>
<p>1.  I was not spouting.  I have an opinion and I am entitled to it.<br />
2.  I have suggested that the approach be far different. If you want a discourse on the topic and really want to educate as you say you do, I think it would be better to do it in a manner that actually indicates that you would like a discourse rather than lecturing and indicating that you think someone who wants gun control is just dumb.  That goes nowhere.<br />
3.   Statistics can be skewed either way.<br />
4.  I was not arguing.  It was my opinion.  The pr-gum bloggers went on my blog and argued.  I only questioned and refuted some of the arguments that did not seem well supported.  Others were never backed up with anything.<br />
5.  There is no &#8220;appeal to emotion.&#8221;  It was my opinion and how I feel about the topic.  My blog is a forum for expressing my opinions.<br />
6.  You are definitely wrong on this one.  If you look at the sequence, I never called Rustmeister a name.  One day after our conversation was over i received a pingback from his blog.  On his blog he said in essence that I was stupid, crazy and delusional.  So who called who a name?<br />
After that, I wrote a post calling it the way that i see it.  He&#8217;s an NRA shill as I see it based on the badges on his blogs.  I also personally think he&#8217;s a right wingnut since I do not believe that the Second Amendment stands for the proposition that you need guns to overthrow the government, as gun bloggers were saying on my blog.<br />
7.  I received threatening emails and some very not nice comments from people.  I decided to shut down comments and delete because I felt that it was harassment.  That&#8217;s my choice.  When I am getting threatened, I choose to shut down and not post anymore comments form anyone and to delete comments.  I reserve that right.  It was also based on advice from the authorities.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that i may not agree with your arguments, mostly because they are obviously canned, but you can score a lot of points with people by first asking them why they favor gun control and then not making fun of them because they place human life over an assault weapon.  I never want all guns banned.  My father and brother own / have owned guns. I would never want them taken away from them or anyone else, but I do not see the point of having assault weapons.  It is my opinion.  Your opinion on guns is your opinion.</p>
<p>I received a LOT of reaction form the gun bloggers who wrote posts like this (only worse).  You guys did more than I ever could have (assuming that was my intent and it was not) to further the gun control cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sevesteen</title>
		<link>http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Sevesteen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newbieshooter.com/?p=387#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I think you&#039;ve inspired me to do a blog post of my standard rebuttals to the standard anti-gun statistics.  Should save time...I can rebut not only the current argument, but preemptively rebut the next several.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I think you&#8217;ve inspired me to do a blog post of my standard rebuttals to the standard anti-gun statistics.  Should save time&#8230;I can rebut not only the current argument, but preemptively rebut the next several.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Robins</title>
		<link>http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>David Robins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newbieshooter.com/?p=387#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American-Manifesto.com &#187; Debating Antis</title>
		<link>http://www.newbieshooter.com/2009/02/arguing-gun-rightsa-primer-for-antis/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>American-Manifesto.com &#187; Debating Antis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newbieshooter.com/?p=387#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] in the blogosphere about debating anti-gunners lately. Newbie Shooter has chimed in with some suggestions to make it a little more fair for the antis (a noble gesture). No doubt they will ignore him since [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the blogosphere about debating anti-gunners lately. Newbie Shooter has chimed in with some suggestions to make it a little more fair for the antis (a noble gesture). No doubt they will ignore him since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

